Without
Stéphane BouquetWe must always alight on the livingness of things. At
breakfast, someone:
“the winters are warming so the electrical companies
make less
profit.” Or else they’re going to destroy an
unprofitable hospital
and its precious art brut frescoes. “Oh no!” says
common indignation, but yes,
though if I watch mostly the splendor of moats beneath
the oblique and hesitating
light of morning, perhaps the sky has Sunday
as its only actual project, before there were
dozens of ducks, where are they, the tearful
owner’s sigh, what’s left
is the noisy profusion of insects trees and their foliage
feeble respite even
if I wanted to say it’s fully snowing today, I
mean that
quasi-pharmaceutical protective powder
naturally preventing
fear. It is not however going to snow at all but there are
lots of soldiers
in the streets these days, a sort of consolation prize
like living
in an unhurtable bulletproof vest. In the end poet =
the indefatigable maker
of shield-sentences behind which to hide to
re-calm gently,
the calm of safe and sound. What is it to live? This time
etymology
isn’t going to be much help. In Indo-European to live
already meant, it seems, to live
and nothing else. Back to the beginning. Perhaps it’s
enough to accumulate a bunch of gestures
and see what the meaning is at the end. Or not meaning:
“apricot trees exist,
apricot trees exist” (Inger Christensen) and there isn’t any
useful meaning. One day
the jellyfish in turn found that their form
fit the circumstances
and stayed in it. That’s what matters: to sink into the ideal
or provisionally ideal
form. Of course these days
the Marie Antoinettes
of the financial aristocracy
stuff themselves with gluten-free
brioche: “oh little spelt,” she purrs, swooning on her silken divan,
body chiseled
to a monied svelte. In the end it is perhaps better
that the world just melts
as fast as possible. There’ll be a new flood—I apologize
to all the sacrificed
species, polar bear and monk seal, I
am sorry—then a neo-Greek
will come to explain the two fundamental reasons
for being, ousia as
the ancient Aristotle said, matter without actual project but
full of desire
the foremost being, I need badly to caress you.
Everything happens in Syntagma Square,
the great hopefulness of assembled
sentences.
—Come, he says, we must learn to add up in this
bereft world,
imagine the inauguration of the without republic: without the
lazy possibility
of landscapes, I mean where to laze and lounge,
the banks
abruptly shut by unilateral decree as if the
reserves of saliva were
exhausted or uncertain, without a certain number
of promises
nevertheless marvelously to be kept, without the light
of evening when the sun
wastes us
generously, at our backs, without a single name to call,
without general strike
or the consolation of back alleys where the stray cats
wander
without the list of all the rest which I cut short and which was truly
also possible.